So tenfootpole.org reviewed Lair of the Shorlee Wyrm and didn't like it. Great! There's no such thing as bad publicity. In six years of game publishing you'll get a bad review or two along the way, and believe me, we certainly have. I don't care about bad reviews as long as the information is factually accurate and useful to the reader, and this underscores the very real service reviewers provide. I mean, people's money is on the line. But as gatekeepers of all that's good and right, they occasionally forget that they too can put out a crappy product, and in this spirit, we offer our review of a certain bad review of our product...
The review starts off strong, meaning highly detailed, describing the setting and general atmosphere. It's actually quite good, as it gives the reader a sense of what the module has to offer and how the adventure begins. The reviewer likes the low-magic vibe and makes several useful comparisons to the Harn setting that might resonate with those already familiar with it, which really boosts the utility of the review, at least to begin with.
And then the review, and its value and usefulness, begins to drag. The reviewer is clearly taken aback back the sudden shift in tone, as the underworld is a fantastic affair in contrast to the mundane surface. His disappointment is legitimate if he really hoped for a low magic setting all the way through; but when has D&D ever been anything close to that? The fact is, this shift is deliberate, for the surface world is ordinary while the underworld is a place of excitement and wonder. He's entitled to his opinion, and he does inform the reader.
What follows is the obligatory rant in keeping with his site's schtick. Kobolds can't have furniture (apparently). He's fine with dragons and wizards, but draws the line at furniture for some reason. The cultists commit suicide, which he ridicules because, hey, that's never happened before, right? I think he owes Heaven's Gate and Jim Jones an apology, which isn't to make light of these horrific tragedies. It's an amusing, but useless, bit.
As the piece wears on, it becomes increasingly clear that the reviewer stopped paying attention after their initial disappointment at the shift in tone, for there are multiple factually incorrect statements about the adventure. A certain NPC joins the party, but absolutely refuses to help, proof that the dungeon denies a party any advantage. This is wrong. The text clearly states that they help once the party earns their trust, and that the referee can adjudicate this as they see fit. These gross errors of omission continue throughout...
The suicidal cultists die before revealing anything. Can't a party get a break? And how ridiculous. I mean, fanatical devotees to darkness would never do that. But he completely ignores that the kobolds will talk and have the same information. After declaring the adventure a mere hack, he complains that a party only collects 10,000 cp and 5,000 sp, strongly implying that this is the sum total of all treasure from the dungeon when it's just the loot from one of many encounters. The laziness here shatters credibility.
It's clear the reviewer didn't pay attention. He complains that the cult has no presence in the township when the introduction makes it clear that the dungeon just opened to the surface and the monsters below are only now going above. This would be useful information about the nature of the adventure, but the reviewer would rather cherry pick and bitch. He calls the adventure a hack, ignoring that many old-school adventures are. I checked, and this was meant as an insult. For someone playing since 1978, he doesn't understand that a dungeon is merely a sandbox that can be approached many ways. So much for old-school...
The review ends on a more useful note, making some genuine points about encounter descriptions and product previews. We listened and expanded our preview on Drive-Thru RPG because we're big enough to take good advice. But dear God, you have to wade through some rants and misleading falsehoods to get there, and the blatantly false assertions about the adventure's content and implications are enough to give the review an F; but this site borders on parody and thrives on schtick, so I'll give it a C for effort. It's just too bad that potential buyers are badly mislead. I can only hope that they're in on the joke.
Lair of the Shorlee Wyrm is available as a digital download. You can check out our expanded preview and pick up the module here, assuming it's your cup of tea. Have a great day!
